McDonald's vs. Burger King: A Comprehensive U.S. Store Locations Analysis

March 21, 2025
08 mins read
Share this post
Follow
If you want to use this component with Finsweet's Table of Contents attributes, follow these steps:
  1. Remove the current class from the content27_link item as Webflows native current state will automatically be applied.
  2. To add interactions which automatically expand and collapse sections in the table of contents, select the content27_h-trigger element, add an element trigger, and select Mouse click (tap).
  3. For the 1st click, select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Expand], and for the 2nd click, select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Collapse].
  4. In the Trigger Settings, deselect all checkboxes other than Desktop and above. This disables the interaction on tablet and below to prevent bugs when scrolling.

When it comes to the fast-food industry, McDonald’s and Burger King are two of the biggest players on the market. With their iconic burgers, fries, and shakes, both brands have dominated the global fast-food scene for decades. But how do they compare in terms of store density, geographic coverage, and market saturation in the United States?

This analysis dives into McDonald's and Burger King's store locations across the U.S., exploring their distribution strategies, regional strength, and store performance. By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear understanding of which brand has the upper hand in location strategy and how each brand is competing in the ever-evolving fast-food landscape.

Store Density: McDonald's Leads the Pack

One of the first things you’ll notice when comparing McDonald’s vs. Burger King is the sheer size of their store networks. According to the latest data:

  • McDonald’s has a massive presence, with over 13,000 locations in the United States. This makes it the most extensive fast-food chain in the country.
  • Burger King, on the other hand, operates around 7,000 locations across the U.S., which is roughly half of McDonald's footprint.

The store density—or the number of stores in a specific area—shows that McDonald's is not only more widespread but also has a larger concentration of stores in key metropolitan areas. For example, in urban centers like New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, McDonald’s can be found in almost every corner of the city, making it the go-to brand for fast food.

Geographic Coverage: McDonald’s Nationwide, Burger King Focuses on Key Regions

When you dig into the geographic distribution of these two chains, there’s a clear divide in strategy:

  • McDonald’s has a truly nationwide presence, covering almost every state in the U.S. From New York to California, McDonald’s operates in urban, suburban, and even rural areas. This broad geographic coverage allows McDonald's to cater to a wide range of customers, from city dwellers to travelers along highways.
  • Burger King, while still widely available, tends to focus more heavily on key metropolitan areas and specific regions where it has a stronger brand presence. States like Florida, Texas, and California host a higher concentration of Burger King outlets. Burger King's geographic footprint is also a little more concentrated in certain markets, especially in the Southeast and Midwest regions, compared to McDonald's broader reach.

Despite this, Burger King's strategy seems to focus on targeting regions with growing populations and a higher density of fast-food customers, while McDonald's continues to serve all corners of the U.S., no matter how far off the beaten path.

Market Saturation: McDonald’s Dominates the Market

When it comes to market saturation, McDonald’s is clearly in a dominant position. With over 13,000 locations and an extensive network, McDonald’s is heavily ingrained in the American culture and landscape. As the largest fast-food chain in the world, its widespread presence allows it to compete aggressively with Burger King in nearly every market.

  • In terms of market share, McDonald’s holds a significant edge, outperforming Burger King in most states across the U.S.
  • Burger King, while not far behind in popularity, is more selective in where it operates. Its regional concentration provides the brand with a strong foothold in specific markets but limits its overall penetration compared to McDonald’s.

Regional Differences: Where Each Chain Thrives

Despite McDonald’s national dominance, Burger King has a stronghold in certain regions. Let’s break down how these two brands perform in key states:

  • California: Both brands have a significant presence, but McDonald’s edges out Burger King with a higher concentration of outlets in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco. However, Burger King has more saturation in suburban areas.
  • Texas: Burger King thrives in Texas, where it has a notable share of the market, especially in urban areas like Dallas and Houston. McDonald’s, however, still leads in total store numbers.
  • Florida: Florida is a critical market for both brands. McDonald’s is heavily present in cities like Miami and Orlando, but Burger King also enjoys a stronghold, especially in central and south Florida.
  • New York: McDonald’s is undeniably dominant in New York City, but Burger King has been able to capture a larger slice of the market in suburban areas.

Consumer Behavior: The Battle for Fast Food Lovers

While store density and geographic coverage play a significant role, consumer preferences also shape how these brands are perceived. Let’s take a quick look at how customers view both brands:

  • McDonald’s: Known for its consistent quality, family-friendly environment, and iconic menu items like the Big Mac, McDonald’s has widespread appeal. It also caters to a diverse demographic, from families with kids to business professionals on the go.
  • Burger King: Burger King’s flame-grilled burgers and Whopper have made it a favorite among burger enthusiasts. While it’s often seen as the second choice for many customers, it holds strong loyalty in areas where it has the largest market share.

Conclusion: Who Comes Out on Top?

In the battle of McDonald’s vs. Burger King, McDonald’s unquestionably leads when it comes to store density, geographic coverage, and market saturation in the U.S. Its ability to reach customers across the entire country and serve diverse demographics gives it the edge. However, Burger King’s focused regional strategy has allowed it to carve out a niche in key markets, and its unique offerings continue to win over burger lovers.

For those in the fast-food industry or anyone investing in restaurant chains, understanding these distribution patterns is crucial. If you’re seeking to expand or compete in the fast-food sector, knowing where to focus your efforts—whether you are McDonald’s or Burger King—can significantly impact your growth strategy.

Next Steps for Businesses:

  • Want to learn more about how these brands are performing in specific regions?
  • Interested in site selection or market research for your next restaurant location?

Contact xMap today to access real-time geospatial data, helping you make data-driven decisions in the competitive world of food service.

Subscribe for advanced Data analysis Tips and Reports

Thank you! We've received your submission.
Oops! Something went wrong. Please try again.

Get in Touch

Whatever your goal or project size, we will handle it.
We will ensure you 100% satisfication.

sales@xmap.ai
+1 (415) 800-3938
800 North King Street Wilmington, DE 19801, United States
1 Chome-17-1 Toranomon, Minato City, Tokyo 105-6415, Japan
"We focus on delivering quality data tailored to businesses needs from all around the world. Whether you are a restaurant, a hotel, or even a gym, you can empower your operations' decisions with geo-data.”
Mo Batran
CEO & Founder @ xMap
Valid number
Thank you for contacting xMap team!

We have received your message and one of our client success team will get back to you shortly.
Oops! Something went wrong. Please try again.